[sub-project] Perfect cuboid

Fehler und Wünsche zum Projekt yoyo@home
Bugs and wishes for the project yoyo@home
Nachricht
Autor
Zak
Prozessor-Polier
Prozessor-Polier
Beiträge: 109
Registriert: 04.11.2017 12:27

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#193 Ungelesener Beitrag von Zak » 19.07.2018 09:24

Excellent, but let's move to the triple dimension. Now do the same with the other two face diagonals for Euler's brick. Then imagine that we have placed the three halves of the sweep so that the points C and A coincide for all three cases, since the length of the space diagonal is the same. As a result, I want to see from you a triple cyclic equation for the length of the CA by dint of coordinates.

Zak
Prozessor-Polier
Prozessor-Polier
Beiträge: 109
Registriert: 04.11.2017 12:27

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#194 Ungelesener Beitrag von Zak » 19.07.2018 12:04

If I am not mistaken
fig02.jpg
fig02.jpg (26.83 KiB) 2549 mal betrachtet

x3mEn
XBOX360-Installer
XBOX360-Installer
Beiträge: 99
Registriert: 20.03.2011 22:23

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#195 Ungelesener Beitrag von x3mEn » 19.07.2018 20:16

CodeCogs2.gif
CodeCogs2.gif (10.31 KiB) 2545 mal betrachtet

Zak
Prozessor-Polier
Prozessor-Polier
Beiträge: 109
Registriert: 04.11.2017 12:27

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#196 Ungelesener Beitrag von Zak » 20.07.2018 22:15

O.K. Thanks. So if we have an irrational space diagonal then at least one of coordinate will be irrational. I will show you the invariance test.
I have write up a square to you:

(a^2+b^2)+c^2

(c^2+a^2)+b^2

(b^2+c^2)+a^2

It's a square. You can see the vertical rows and horizontal lines in it. And everywhere in them will be the alternation of variables: a,b,c. And we can also see diagonals, in one of which there is also an alternation of the same variables: b,a,c, and in the other diagonal there is only one variable: a,a,a.

Lets: a - odd, b - even, c - even.
Let's write our square one more time:

(odd+even)+even

(even+odd)+even

(even+even)+odd

Try to find the rows, lines and diagonals in it.
As a result, we have integer value under square root, but irrational value of square root.

BlackObelisk
Idle-Sammler
Idle-Sammler
Beiträge: 3
Registriert: 27.07.2018 20:29

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#197 Ungelesener Beitrag von BlackObelisk » 27.07.2018 20:36

I think score system for perfect cuboid is bugged for Ubuntu and someone (deliberately or not?) abusing it. How on earth Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z3735F @ 1.33GHz can outperform Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5560 @ 2.80GHz ? If u and your wingman run special version of Ubuntu/BOINC u get 1200 points instead of 200. For example this host http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//result ... tid=429410 I hope admin can fix it.

Zak
Prozessor-Polier
Prozessor-Polier
Beiträge: 109
Registriert: 04.11.2017 12:27

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#198 Ungelesener Beitrag von Zak » 28.07.2018 02:11

x3mEn
How do you thing about this:
02.jpg
02.jpg (65.22 KiB) 2458 mal betrachtet

Benutzeravatar
gemini8
Vereinsmitglied
Vereinsmitglied
Beiträge: 3212
Registriert: 31.05.2011 10:30
Wohnort: Hannover

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#199 Ungelesener Beitrag von gemini8 » 28.07.2018 09:01

BlackObelisk hat geschrieben:I think score system for perfect cuboid is bugged for Ubuntu and someone (deliberately or not?) abusing it. How on earth Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z3735F @ 1.33GHz can outperform Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5560 @ 2.80GHz ? If u and your wingman run special version of Ubuntu/BOINC u get 1200 points instead of 200. For example this host http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//result ... tid=429410 I hope admin can fix it.
I think you're mistaken. The Atom is the slower one.
And I think yoyo might award additional credit for fast return.
Gruß, Jens
- - - - - -
Lowend-User und Teilzeitcruncher

Bild Bild
Bild

BlackObelisk
Idle-Sammler
Idle-Sammler
Beiträge: 3
Registriert: 27.07.2018 20:29

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#200 Ungelesener Beitrag von BlackObelisk » 28.07.2018 09:20

gemini8 hat geschrieben:I think you're mistaken. The Atom is the slower one.
And I think yoyo might award additional credit for fast return.
No, if you are double-checked by normal host you will get the same score around 200, but if you double checked by ubuntu host with ridiculously high integer speed you will get 1200. Also check Top Hosts, Atom has same RAC as Xeon and some 4th generations of i7, seriously?

(note total score of atom is very low, and it was added on March, not that long ago)
top.jpg
top.jpg (133 KiB) 2444 mal betrachtet

x3mEn
XBOX360-Installer
XBOX360-Installer
Beiträge: 99
Registriert: 20.03.2011 22:23

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#201 Ungelesener Beitrag von x3mEn » 31.07.2018 04:53

BlackObelisk hat geschrieben:I think score system for perfect cuboid is bugged for Ubuntu and someone (deliberately or not?) abusing it. How on earth Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z3735F @ 1.33GHz can outperform Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5560 @ 2.80GHz ? If u and your wingman run special version of Ubuntu/BOINC u get 1200 points instead of 200. For example this host http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//result ... tid=429410 I hope admin can fix it.
I guess you are right, I also had found those, Ubuntu (maybe all *nix) clients are earned by more credits.
The root of the problem lies on extremely different MIPS measurement in Ubuntu versus Windows system.
Look, for example, at:
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/show_ho ... stid=25456
  • AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 1]
  • Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.10586.00)
  • Measured floating point speed: 4292.94 million ops/sec
  • Measured integer speed: 16230.61 million ops/sec
and compare with this one:
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/show_ho ... tid=434292
  • AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor [Family 23 Model 1 Stepping 1]
  • Ubuntu 18.04 LTS [4.15.0-24-generic|libc 2.27 (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.27-3ubuntu1)]
  • Measured floating point speed: 4745.57 million ops/sec
  • Measured integer speed: 109708.58 million ops/sec
That's why *nix BOINC clients claim significantly more credits than Windows clients.
Credits earned are calculated as 2*min(claimed_credits)
When both, you and your wingmen have *nix, you both get more credits, than any Windows-Windows pair under the same other conditions.

BlackObelisk
Idle-Sammler
Idle-Sammler
Beiträge: 3
Registriert: 27.07.2018 20:29

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#202 Ungelesener Beitrag von BlackObelisk » 01.08.2018 18:41

Looks like it's bugged only in ubuntu 17.10 and 18.04, other Linux clients get usual amount, but that one... both claim only 600, but granted 1200.

x3mEn
XBOX360-Installer
XBOX360-Installer
Beiträge: 99
Registriert: 20.03.2011 22:23

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#203 Ungelesener Beitrag von x3mEn » 01.08.2018 23:23

BlackObelisk hat geschrieben:both claim only 600, but granted 1200.
As I have already said above, granted credits (for each of both) = 2*min(claimed credits by both)
For instance: http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo//workun ... d=39448720
host=434292 claimed 596.74
host=429410 claimed 695.48
granted credits = 2*min(596.74, 695.48) = 1,193.47

Benutzeravatar
yoyo
Vereinsvorstand
Vereinsvorstand
Beiträge: 7784
Registriert: 17.12.2002 14:09
Wohnort: Berlin
Kontaktdaten:

Re: [sub-project] Perfect cuboid

#204 Ungelesener Beitrag von yoyo » 02.08.2018 06:30

Some days back I limited the maximum credit you can get.
HILF mit im Rechenkraft-WiKi, dies gibts zu tun.
Wiki - FAQ - Verein - Chat

Bild Bild

Antworten

Zurück zu „Fehler, Wünsche / Bugs, Wishes“