Rechenkraft.net e.V.

cms_GA[e30-50MB_Lin64f]_Oryza-sativa-Indica-Group_CM000128.lin.EMBL_RF00028_Intron_gpI_1292793954_1 WU . Created on December 18th. task . Sent to my machine on January 28th. Hours spent running so far: 249 hours Completed after 930 hours! Valid and credit awarded That was the final task on this mac...

I appreciate the 2x credits. That makes up for failed tasks, assuming they make it 50% of the time. I have had 1 of about 7 complete and validate so far.

I have another 4 tasks that have been running for quite a while now. Can someone please confirm I am not wasting my time *again*? cms_GA[e30-50MB_Lin64f]_Oryza-sativa-Indica-Group_CM000128.lin.EMBL_RF00028_Intron_gpI_1292793954_1 WU . Created on December 18th. task . Sent to my machine on January 2...

Norman hat geschrieben:how much is your bigest RAM-peak with this monsters so far until now?

Not sure what the peak has been. Right now, that machine is using 4.34gb total.

I have another 4 tasks that have been running for quite a while now. Can someone please confirm I am not wasting my time *again*? cms_GA[e30-50MB_Lin64f]_Oryza-sativa-Indica-Group_CM000128.lin.EMBL_RF00028_Intron_gpI_1292793954_1 WU . Created on December 18th. task . Sent to my machine on January 2...

laurenu2 hat geschrieben:I just aborted a 1/2 dozen WU's that were running for 139+ Hrs each
I thought you got passed this problem a half year ago
Or are these the same WU that few members complete and keep being passed out

Tasks often run up to a thousand hours. Why did you abort them?

Thanks. I thought there was an issue with WUs created before December. Okay, will keep on crunching them.

I have another 4 tasks that have been running for quite a while now. Can someone please confirm I am not wasting my time *again*? cms_GA[e30-50MB_Lin64f]_Oryza-sativa-Indica-Group_CM000128.lin.EMBL_RF00028_Intron_gpI_1292793954_1 WU . Created on December 18th. task . Sent to my machine on January 28...

How do you know they were defective? Well, good question. In fact, I do not know for sure and it's just an assumption. But it seemed at least three of those WUs got stuck at 100% for hours or longer, so I assumed these will be defective. No definite proof however. The really big tasks can be at 100...

Mad Matt hat geschrieben:You are missing the point. You don't get credits for aborted WUs. And before you post again: that's pretty normal as well. But here I lost about 300 hs of computing time for defective WUs, which seems a tad too much for me. Maybe not for you though.

How do you know they were defective?

Got it. Thanks!

Are stats exported only daily? Any chance that frequency could be increased? Four times per day would be great.