0 credit for hours of crunching?

Alles zum Projekt yoyo@home
Everything about the project yoyo@home
Nachricht
Autor

Torbjörn Klatt
Vereinsmitglied
Vereinsmitglied
Beiträge: 1333
Registriert: 23.04.2007 21:18
Wohnort: Bad Homburg, HR, D, Earth, Sol, Milkyway

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#2 Ungelesener Beitrag von Torbjörn Klatt » 01.02.2009 14:58

Is this your computer? ID 11651

It seems the first work unit does not exists. Yoyo may tell more about that. The other three work units were aborted because of a computing error caused by your computer. You only get credits for valid results.

There are various reasons why computing errors occur. Do you overclock your CPU? Often overclocking the CPU leads to computing errors.

Regards,
Bohne
alias Bohne2k7
bevorzugte Projekte: WCG, RNA World, Yoyo
Profil (RKN-Wiki) | www: torbjoern-klatt.de | Twitter: @torbjoernklatt | Diaspora*: torbjoernk@diasp.de
Bild

Benutzeravatar
laguna
TuX-omane
TuX-omane
Beiträge: 2789
Registriert: 08.10.2003 09:36
Wohnort: Ettingshausen

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#3 Ungelesener Beitrag von laguna » 01.02.2009 15:21

I would guess that your Maschine ran out of memory. You have two Cores, and only two GB of RAM.
The ecm WUs use up to 1GB of RAM each...
Bild Bild

Torbjörn Klatt
Vereinsmitglied
Vereinsmitglied
Beiträge: 1333
Registriert: 23.04.2007 21:18
Wohnort: Bad Homburg, HR, D, Earth, Sol, Milkyway

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#4 Ungelesener Beitrag von Torbjörn Klatt » 01.02.2009 15:35

laguna hat geschrieben:I would guess that your Maschine ran out of memory. You have two Cores, and only two GB of RAM.
The ecm WUs use up to 1GB of RAM each...
That is not that critical. I also have a duo-core CPU and only 2GB of RAM. If the machine ran out of memory the ECM-WU will pause and wait for memory and not quit with a computing error.

Regards,
Bohne
alias Bohne2k7
bevorzugte Projekte: WCG, RNA World, Yoyo
Profil (RKN-Wiki) | www: torbjoern-klatt.de | Twitter: @torbjoernklatt | Diaspora*: torbjoernk@diasp.de
Bild

Benutzeravatar
laguna
TuX-omane
TuX-omane
Beiträge: 2789
Registriert: 08.10.2003 09:36
Wohnort: Ettingshausen

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#5 Ungelesener Beitrag von laguna » 01.02.2009 15:59

Bohne2k7 hat geschrieben:
laguna hat geschrieben:I would guess that your Maschine ran out of memory. You have two Cores, and only two GB of RAM.
The ecm WUs use up to 1GB of RAM each...
That is not that critical. I also have a duo-core CPU and only 2GB of RAM. If the machine ran out of memory the ECM-WU will pause and wait for memory and not quit with a computing error.

Regards,
Bohne
The problem ist that ecm WUs only use the high memory demands in their last phase.
If BOINC start two at the same time (only using little RAM, and therefore not a problem for BOINC as enough RAM is available at that time) those will reach the high RAM phase simultaneously...
I lost many WUs exactly this way... Thats why I upgraded to 4GB...
Zuletzt geändert von laguna am 01.02.2009 16:02, insgesamt 1-mal geändert.
Bild Bild

Urvabara
Taschenrechner
Taschenrechner
Beiträge: 8
Registriert: 01.02.2009 08:57

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#6 Ungelesener Beitrag von Urvabara » 01.02.2009 16:00

Bohne2k7 hat geschrieben:Is this your computer? ID 11651
Yes.
Bohne2k7 hat geschrieben:You only get credits for valid results.
;(
Bohne2k7 hat geschrieben:Do you overclock your CPU?
No. I also have a huge CPU cooler and a fan.

Thanks.

Urvabara
Taschenrechner
Taschenrechner
Beiträge: 8
Registriert: 01.02.2009 08:57

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#7 Ungelesener Beitrag von Urvabara » 01.02.2009 16:03

laguna hat geschrieben:I would guess that your Maschine ran out of memory. You have two Cores, and only two GB of RAM.
The ecm WUs use up to 1GB of RAM each...
Only two? Two gigabytes is a vast amount of memory.

Thanks.

Benutzeravatar
laguna
TuX-omane
TuX-omane
Beiträge: 2789
Registriert: 08.10.2003 09:36
Wohnort: Ettingshausen

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#8 Ungelesener Beitrag von laguna » 01.02.2009 16:12

Urvabara hat geschrieben:
laguna hat geschrieben:I would guess that your Maschine ran out of memory. You have two Cores, and only two GB of RAM.
The ecm WUs use up to 1GB of RAM each...
Only two? Two gigabytes is a vast amount of memory.

Thanks.
Not for ecm with two cores both running ecm WUs.
I have reached peak levels of RAM usage of over 3 GB, when two ecm WUs reached their last phase at the same time...
Bild Bild

Benutzeravatar
X1900AIW
TuX-omane
TuX-omane
Beiträge: 2869
Registriert: 05.01.2008 16:34

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#9 Ungelesener Beitrag von X1900AIW » 01.02.2009 16:22

As yoyo told us (in this german thread) the big ECM workunits could call for (up to) 1,5 GB in phase 2/Win32. I upgraded to 4 GB in the quad system to cover just "normal" situation with four workunits within a RAM wasteful operating system like Vista, in the end 6GB should be well enough for quads. :oops:

@laguna
32-Bit or 64-Bit ?
Zusammenkommen ist ein Beginn, Zusammenbleiben ist ein Fortschritt, Zusammenarbeiten ist ein Erfolg.
Henry Ford

Benutzeravatar
laguna
TuX-omane
TuX-omane
Beiträge: 2789
Registriert: 08.10.2003 09:36
Wohnort: Ettingshausen

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#10 Ungelesener Beitrag von laguna » 01.02.2009 20:19

X1900AIW hat geschrieben:As yoyo told us (in this german thread) the big ECM workunits could call for (up to) 1,5 GB in phase 2/Win32. I upgraded to 4 GB in the quad system to cover just "normal" situation with four workunits within a RAM wasteful operating system like Vista, in the end 6GB should be well enough for quads. :oops:

@laguna
32-Bit or 64-Bit ?
I upgraded to 64 bit Ubuntu and 64 Bit Vista to use the whole 4GB.
(Actually at first I had left the old 667MHz RAM inside to have 6GB, but for better performance I dropped them).
Bild Bild

Urvabara
Taschenrechner
Taschenrechner
Beiträge: 8
Registriert: 01.02.2009 08:57

Re: 0 credit for hours of crunching?

#11 Ungelesener Beitrag von Urvabara » 11.02.2009 05:33

Ok, thanks guys. Maybe I'll buy at least 2 gigabytes of more memory quite soon...

Zurück zu „Number crunching“