Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
They run faster on Linux or with the 700.02 version on Win 64.
- Beyond
- Prozessor-Polier
- Beiträge: 111
- Registriert: 02.02.2008 01:48
- Wohnort: Rum River watershed, MN, USA
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Now I'm having issues with 3 705.02 WUs:
According to BoincTasks, none of these WUs are going to make deadline. Up to 56+ hours with no checkpoints. What's going on with ECM lately?
Code: Alles auswählen
ecm_as_1482588349_C305_142_139xyT1e25_302_P1_2 56:22:48 hours (-) 32.453% 95:12:24 62:32:26 26.0 °C 0 705.02 ecm Running High P. [0] 00:00:00 0.0 3.48 MB
ecm_as_1482588349_C305_142_139xyT1e25_166_P1_2 47:25:39 hours (-) 28.111% 99:02:53 71:07:44 26.0 °C 0 705.02 ecm Running High P. [0] 00:00:00 0.0 3.48 MB
ecm_as_1482588349_C305_142_139xyT1e25_829_P1_2 40:16:33 hours (-) 24.442% 102:11:40 78:07:42 26.0 °C 0 705.02 ecm Running High P. [0] 00:00:00 0.0 3.47 MB
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Those P1 and P2 ecm workunits are currently tests for a higher range.
According to the server DB your 3 mentioned workunits are already finished.
According to the server DB your 3 mentioned workunits are already finished.
- Beyond
- Prozessor-Polier
- Beiträge: 111
- Registriert: 02.02.2008 01:48
- Wohnort: Rum River watershed, MN, USA
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Not much of an answer. There is something VERY VERY wrong with these WUs:yoyo hat geschrieben:Those P1 and P2 ecm workunits are currently tests for a higher range.
According to the server DB your 3 mentioned workunits are already finished.
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/workuni ... d=29184207
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/workuni ... d=29184870
http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/workuni ... d=29184734
All 3 were failed by 2 different machines before they got to me. One of them tied up somebodies CPU for 546,395.22 seconds before it failed. My machines supposedly ran them for 0 seconds and also supposedly returned them successfully. However on each WU your ECM app crashed and BOINC still thought the WU was running until I investigated and killed the processes. So far in the last week or so I've had around 450 hours of downtime on these CPUs due to ECM app and/or WU errors. I think we should really expect a little investigation/explanation concerning the problem rather than "3 mentioned workunits are already finished".
Again, this is the #1 machine on your project and the #1 machine for running ECM. It's error free when fed valid apps and WUs. I would think some investigation is needed.
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Regarding the first one:
1 result didn't return
2nd was running on ARM which hadn't installed the gmp-ecm package, which is a precondition on ARM. This is also mentioned in the error output if the result.
3rd, yours, errored with an assertion "Expression: B1 < 3124253146UL". This is a specific problem on Windows. This is fixed in wu generator for future wus to run such workunits with an additional parameter to avoid this problem.
Regarding your workunits it is 3 times the same issue.
1 result didn't return
2nd was running on ARM which hadn't installed the gmp-ecm package, which is a precondition on ARM. This is also mentioned in the error output if the result.
3rd, yours, errored with an assertion "Expression: B1 < 3124253146UL". This is a specific problem on Windows. This is fixed in wu generator for future wus to run such workunits with an additional parameter to avoid this problem.
Regarding your workunits it is 3 times the same issue.
- Beyond
- Prozessor-Polier
- Beiträge: 111
- Registriert: 02.02.2008 01:48
- Wohnort: Rum River watershed, MN, USA
Re: Anyone having issues with ecm 700.02 WUs?
Thanks for the explanation. Hopefully the WUs are now fixed. I'm getting gun-shy...yoyo hat geschrieben:Regarding the first one:
1 result didn't return
2nd was running on ARM which hadn't installed the gmp-ecm package, which is a precondition on ARM. This is also mentioned in the error output if the result.
3rd, yours, errored with an assertion "Expression: B1 < 3124253146UL". This is a specific problem on Windows. This is fixed in wu generator for future wus to run such workunits with an additional parameter to avoid this problem.
Regarding your workunits it is 3 times the same issue.